ANALISIS LANGKAH AKTIVITAS FISIK SISWA MAN 1 KOTA TASIKMALAYA SELAMA PEMBELAJARAN PJOK

Muchammad Fathoni; Gumilar Mulya; Juhrodin

doi:10.36728/jip.v12i1.5956

Muchammad Fathoni Universitas Siliwangi
Gumilar Mulya Universitas Siliwangi
Juhrodin Universitas Siliwangi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36728/jip.v12i1.5956

Kata Kunci: Aktivitas Fisik, PJOK, Remaja, Jumlah Langkah

Abstrak

Aktivitas fisik berperan penting dalam menjaga kesehatan remaja, dan pembelajaran PJOK menjadi salah satu sarana utama pemenuhan aktivitas fisik harian di sekolah. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis jumlah langkah dan tingkat aktivitas fisik siswa MAN 1 Kota Tasikmalaya selama empat sesi pembelajaran PJOK menggunakan aplikasi pedometer Google Fit. Penelitian menggunakan desain survei deskriptif kuantitatif dengan pendekatan cross-sectional. Sampel terdiri dari 70 siswa kelas X yang dipilih melalui teknik cluster sampling. Pengukuran dilakukan selama empat pertemuan dengan durasi masing-masing 2 × 45 menit. Data dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan kategori tertil untuk menentukan tingkat aktivitas fisik. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata jumlah langkah siswa berada pada kategori aktivitas sedang, dengan persebaran yang relatif seimbang antara kategori rendah, sedang, dan tinggi. Siswa laki-laki cenderung memiliki jumlah langkah lebih tinggi dibandingkan perempuan. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran PJOK memberikan kontribusi berarti terhadap aktivitas fisik siswa, meskipun pemerataan intensitas aktivitas masih perlu ditingkatkan. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penggunaan teknologi pedometer sebagai alat monitoring sekolah serta strategi pembelajaran yang lebih aktif dan inklusif.

Referensi

Bai, Y., G. J. Welk, Y. H. Nam, dan J. Lee. 2020. “The accuracy of smartphone apps for monitoring physical activity in youth.” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 23(3):251–56.

Case, M. A., H. A. Burwick, K. G. Volpp, dan M. S. Patel. 2020. “Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data.” JAMA 323(3):250–52.

Chen, S., H. Sun, X. Zhu, dan A. Chen. 2020. “Relationship between physical activity and motivational climate in physical education.” Journal of Sport and Health Science 9(5):462–71.

Duncan, M. J., C. M. Roscoe, L. Foweather, dan J. J. Reilly. 2020. “Step counts and physical activity during school-based physical education.” Preventive Medicine 135:106088.

Evenson, K. R., dan F. Wen. 2021. “Measuring physical activity with mobile phones: Validity and reliability of smartphone apps and wearables.” Journal of Physical Activity and Health 18(5):587–95.

Fairclough, S. J., D. Dumuid, K. Hackett, M. Bourke, dan G. Stratton. 2020. “Activity levels during physical education lessons in secondary school students.” European Physical Education Review 26(1):43–59.

Francis, C. E., P. E. Longmuir, C. Boyer, dan M. S. Tremblay. 2020. “Physical activity measurement in children and youth using smartphone applications.” Preventive Medicine Reports 20:101120.

Garcia-Hermoso, A., A. Alonso-Martinez, R. Ramírez-Vélez, dan M. Izquierdo. 2021. “Gender differences in physical activity and sedentary behavior among school-aged adolescents.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 31(3):686–95.

Hardman, C., P. Horne, dan D. A. Rowe. 2022. “Evaluating intensity and patterns of movement in secondary physical education.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 27(2):129–42.

Kim, Y., E. Lee, dan J. Park. 2023. “Step count accuracy of mobile health applications during moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.” JMIR mHealth and uHealth 11(1):e38751.

Kowalski, K. C., M. Horvat, dan V. Djonov. 2021. “The role of instructional design in enhancing physical activity during physical education lessons.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 26(6):623–39.

Lee, J., X. Li, dan T. Zhang. 2021. “Physical activity levels and patterns in high school physical education classes.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 92(4):665–75.

Marmett, T., J. Rodrigues, dan L. Silva. 2021. “Validity of smartphone pedometer applications for measuring steps in school-based physical education.” Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 25(4):305–15.

Mateo-Orcajada, A., Ó. Chiva-Bartoll, M. Pans, dan V. Fuster. 2023. “Reliability of smartphone-based pedometer applications for evaluating adolescents’ physical activity.” Journal of Sports Sciences 41(2):215–23.

Organization, World Health. 2020. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. WHO Press.

Routen, A. C., J. P. Johnston, C. Glazebrook, dan L. B. Sherar. 2021. “Levels of free-living physical activity in secondary school physical education lessons.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 40(1):118–29.

Santos, R., C. A. Howe, dan J. F. Sallis. 2020. “Assessing physical activity in youth: Advances in wearable technology.” Sports Medicine 50(3):783–98.

Silva, G., L. Anderson, dan V. P. Lopes. 2022. “Gender differences in physical activity patterns among adolescents: A systematic review.” Journal of Adolescent Health 71(4):556–64.

Warren, J. M., U. Ekelund, dan H. Besson. 2021. “Physical activity intensity during secondary school physical education lessons.” BMC Public Health 21:1843.

Zhu, W., dan N. Owen. 2020. “Physical activity research methods using device-based monitoring.” Journal of Sport and Health Science 9(3):211–12.