River Cleaning as Environmental Education and ASEAN Academic Diplomacy: A Collaborative Community Engagement Practice between Tunas Pembangunan University, Surakarta and Sultan Idris Shah Polytechnic, Malaysia
Abstract
Urban river management faces increasing challenges due to urbanization, domestic waste, and limited community participation. This study analyzes the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) River Cleaning program as a model of experiential environmental education and regional academic diplomacy within a collaboration between Universitas Tunas Pembangunan Surakarta and Sultan Idris Shah Polytechnic, Malaysia. A qualitative case study approach was employed using participatory observation, documentation, and participant reflections during activities conducted in Kali Anyar, Surakarta. Thematic analysis was applied to identify patterns of experiential learning, cross-cultural interaction, and institutional relationships. The findings reveal that the program provided concrete experiences that enabled students to connect technical concepts such as stormwater management and flood control with real urban river conditions. Field experiences also encouraged reflection on the relationship between community behavior, drainage systems, and environmental sustainability. Additionally, cross-national interactions fostered academic dialogue and expanded the role of academic visits into action-based collaborative engagement involving local communities. This study proposes a three-dimensional collaborative engagement model consisting of academic exchange, environmental action, and institutional diplomacy. The model demonstrates that community engagement can serve as an integrative platform for contextual learning, environmental action, and academic diplomacy in supporting sustainable development.
References
Dewey, J. (2008). Experience and education. The Educational Forum, December 2014, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728609335764
Dillon, J., & Wals, A. E. J. (2013). Convetional and emerging learning theories: implications and choices for educational researchers with a planetary consciousness. In R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), International handbook on environmental education (pp. 253–261). Routledge.
Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W. F., Ashley, R., Arthur, S., Trowsdale, S., Barraud, S., Semadeni-, A., Mikkelsen, P. S., Rivard, G., Uhl, M., Dagenais, D., Viklander, M., Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W. F., Ashley, R., Arthur, S., Trowsdale, S., … Dagenais, D. (2015). SUDS , LID , BMPs , WSUD and more – The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water Journal, 12(7), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315303260832
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as The Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall.
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power?: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs Books.
Pahl-wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(2009), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
Paul, M. J., & Meyer, J. L. (2001). Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology Systems, 32, 333–365.
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management?: A literature review. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
Sinaga, O., Hi, A. R., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2025). Environmental policy implementation and communication in the association of Southeast Asian Nations manufacturing?: A comparative case study of three key manufacturing firms in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand (2020–2023). 17.
Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: re-visioning learning and change. Schumacher Society/Green Books.
UNEP. (2016). A snapshot of the world’s water quality: towards a global assessment